| Date
| Context
| Summary of development
| Action
|
|---|
|
12.12.01
| CM
| The Council passed a motion moved by Hon Albert HO as amended by Hon CHEUNG Man-kwong and Hon LAU Kong-wah urging the Government to expeditiously review the existing mechanisms for adjusting the pay and fringe benefits of senior executives of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) and statutory public bodies. [Hansard "page 106"]
|
|
| 4.1.02
| PRESS
| The Chief Secretary for Administration (CS) announced that the Government would appoint a consultant to review the pay structures for the senior executives of nine statutory organizations. These organizations included the Securities and Futures Commission, the Hong Kong Tourism Board, the Mass Transit Railway Corporation Limited, the Hong Kong Trade Development Council, the Airport Authority (AA), the Urban Renewal Authority (URA), the Kowloon-Canton Railway Corporation (KCRC), the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority (MPFA), and HKMA. [Press release]
|
|
| 26.6.02
| PRESS
| The Administration announced the findings and recommendations of the consultancy study on the remuneration packages of senior executives of selected statutory and other bodies. The consultancy study covered 11 statutory and other bodies and two of their subsidiaries, adding to the list of the nine statutory bodies announced in the press release on 4.1.02 were two other organizations, namely, the Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation and the Hong Kong Productivity Council (HKPC). [Press release]
|
|
| 26.6.02
| COU
| CS made a statement on "Review of Remunerations of Senior Executives of Statutory and Other Bodies". [CS's statement] [Hansard "page 81"]
|
|
| 3.7.02
| PS
| The Panel discussed with the Administration on the findings of the consultancy study of remunerations of senior executives of selected statutory and other bodies. The Administration advised that as the role, mission and range of services of HKPC was under review, details of the consultant's findings pertaining to HKPC were not included in the consultant's Final Report. [LegCo Brief (with the consultant's Final Report)]
In response to a member's concern about the reliability of the data collected in the consultancy study, the Administration provided explanation on how the information was obtained. [Follow-up paper]
|
|
| 9.10.02
| CQ
| Hon Emily LAU raised a question on the term of office and ranking of chairperson of Equal Opportunities Commission. [Hansard "page 88"]
|
|
| 25.2.03
| PS
| The Panel discussed with the Administration on its internal review on remuneration of senior executives of government funded bodies. [LegCo Brief] [Report on internal review]
|
|
|
5.3.03
| CQ
| Dr HON LO Wing-lok raised a question on promotion and recruitment of senior executive staff by the Hospital Authority (HA). [Hansard "page 47"]
|
|
| 15.12.03
| PS
| The Panel discussed with the Administration on the responses of statutory and other bodied to the recommendations of the consultancy study on the remuneration of their senior executives. [Paper]
In response to members' request, the Administration provided supplementary information on the comparators for the senior executives of the Hong Kong Tourism Board.
[Follow-up paper]
|
|
|
25.2.04
| CQ
| Dr Hon LO Wing-lok raised a question on HA's granting of performance incentive award to its Chief Executive, Cluster Chief Executives and Hospital Chief Executives. [Hansard "page 51"]
|
|
|
22.6.05
| CQ
| Hon Alan LEONG raised a question on the statistics on directorate staff of 13 statutory bodies. [Hansard "page 86"]
|
|
| 4/06
| PS
| The Subcommittee on West Kowloon Cultural District Development (the Subcommittee), in its Phase II Report, recommended the establishment of a statutory body immediately to spearhead the West Kowloon Cultural District Development. In this connection, the Subcommittee called for the establishment of -
| (a) | a mechanism to determine the remuneration packages for senior executives of statutory bodies; and
| | (b) | a mechanism for disclosure of their remuneration packages to enhance transparency and facilitate monitoring by the Legislative Council and members of the public.
|
The Subcommittee referred its recommendations to the Panel. The Panel then invited the Administration to provide written response to the Subcommittee's recommendations. [Letter from the Clerk to Panel to the Director of Administration] [The Director of Administration's written reply]
|
|
