ISE23/15-16

Subject: welfare services, elderly services, informal carers, support services


  • Long-term care services for the elderly have been trending away from institutionalization and moving towards home care around the world in recent years. This was reflected in a significant increase in the ratio of elderly people receiving care at home among the selected advanced places, from 59% in 2000 to 65% in 2013.1Legend symbol denoting See OECD (2013). Given the choice, many elderly people may prefer living out their years for as long as they can in their own homes to institutional care facilities, but this would require home care assistance. As the delivery of home care relies heavily on family members who may need to quit the workforce and sacrifice work income, some governments offer cash benefits to these informal caregivers both as a recognition of their contribution and also as an incentive to retain them in providing informal home care.
  • In line with the global trend of "ageing in place", the Hong Kong Government launched a pilot scheme on granting living allowance for carers of elderly persons in June 2014. This pilot scheme offers a monthly allowance of HK$2,000 to at most 2 000 caregivers from low-income families for two years. In the 2016 Policy Address, the Chief Executive has announced that the pilot allowance scheme will be extended from carers of elderly to carers of disabled persons in October 2016.
  • While offering cash allowance to informal carers is "new in Hong Kong", it has been a well-established practice in Finland and the United Kingdom ("UK") for more than three decades. Moreover, both countries have fine-tuned the policies to encourage more home care. This issue of Essentials provides a quick overview of the key developments of cash allowance for informal carers in both places.

Carer allowance system in Finland

  • In the early 1980s, some municipal governments in Finland introduced cash allowance for informal caregivers of elderly, disabled and chronically ill persons on an experimental basis. In the following two decades, additional measures such as respite care and monthly rest day were introduced to support carers. Yet this carer support scheme was not a mandatory nationwide scheme, as it was entirely up to the local governments to implement such scheme.
  • In face of a looming fiscal burden arising from increasing demand for institutional care for the elderly amid the ageing trend, the federal government of Finland formalized the carer allowance system and made it mandatory throughout the country in 2005. With a view to encouraging a shift towards home care for cost savings, the Finnish Parliament passed the Support for Informal Carers Act 2005, which made financial payment directly to the informal carers for the care work performed. The following are the key features of the carer allowance system in Finland:

    (a)Non-contributory and non means-testing: Cash allowance granted to caregivers is non-contributory. It does not require means or asset test for both carers and care recipients;

    (b)Minimum level of allowance: While the monthly amount of carer allowance may differ across municipalities, the law has established a minimum rate across Finland. The minimum monthly allowance in 2016 is set at €387 (HK$3,338) for taking care of one elderly person, and this can be increased to €775 (HK$6,665) if the caring work is particularly demanding.2Legend symbol denoting Demanding care includes an end-of-life care situation or care recipient's recovery from a serious surgery. In Helsinki, the allowance can be as high as €1,500 (HK$12,900);

    (c)Taxable and pensionable income: Similar to remuneration to paid job, the carer allowance is taxable and accountable in pension accumulation, offering retirement protection to the carers;

    (d)Contract between carers and local government: Carers need to sign a care agreement with the municipal government, stating clearly their obligations and rights. These in particular include (i) the amount of allowance and hours of care provided by carers per month; (ii) list of care services; (iii) supportive measures for both the carers and care recipients; (iv) rights for the carers to take leave; and (v) training and education opportunities for the carers; and

    (e)Work life balance for carers: Finnish carers were entitled to at least three days of respite care,3Legend symbol denoting In Hong Kong, respite care is just a temporary residential care service for elders who require certain degree of personal care provided by family members or relatives. By contrast, respite leave in Finland is a mandatory and statutory entitlement of carers. relieving their care pressure even though they are taking care of their family members. Apart from statutory leave, carers are also entitled to take break each day outside home to participate in day activities, rehabilitation or training. Carers might request substitute care from the municipalities or additional funding to hire private caregiver during these breaks.
  • Over the past two decades, the total number of carer allowance recipients in Finland have more than tripled, from 13 000 in 1994 to 43 200 in 2014. Matching with 133 000 elderly people currently receiving informal care in the country, around one third of elderly recipients of informal care benefited from the carer allowance system.
  • According to an evaluation study conducted by an academic on the basis of the dataset provided by the government, development of informal care including the carer allowance system has considerably reduced public expenditure on elderly care in Finland.4Legend symbol denoting See Kehusmaa, S. et al. (2013) and Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (2014). It is estimated that the annual cost of informal care for an elderly person was just around €4,900-€6,000 (HK$42,140-HK$51,600), less than a quarter of the respective cost of around €25,300 (HK$217,091) in formal and institutional care.

Carer allowance system in the United Kingdom


Prepared by Phoebe TANG
Research Office
Information Services Division
Legislative Council Secretariat
13 July 2016


Endnotes:

1.See OECD (2013).

2.Demanding care includes an end-of-life care situation or care recipient's recovery from a serious surgery.

3.In Hong Kong, respite care is just a temporary residential care service for elders who require certain degree of personal care provided by family members or relatives. By contrast, respite leave in Finland is a mandatory and statutory entitlement of carers.

4.See Kehusmaa, S. et al. (2013) and Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (2014).

5.When first introduced in 1975, the allowance was only available to men and single women of working age who had given up paid employment to care for disabled family members. The allowance scheme was then extended to individuals caring for distant kin and friends in 1981, to married women and people caring for non-relatives in 1986, and to those over the age of 65 in 2003.

6.The five qualifying disability benefits are: (a) Personal Independence Payment (daily living component); (b) Disability Living Allowance (middle or highest care rate); (c) Attendance Allowance; (d) Constant Attendance Allowance (at or above the normal maximum rate with an Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit or basic (full day) rate with a War Disablement Pension); and (e) Armed Forces Independence Payment.

7.The main pieces of legislation and policy directives include (a) Carers (Recognition and Service) Act 1995; (b) National Carers' Strategy in 1999; (c) Carers and Disabled Children Act 2000; and (d) Carers (Equal Opportunities) Act 2004.

8.The main pieces of legislation and policy directives include (a) Carers (Recognition and Service) Act 1995; (b) National Carers' Strategy in 1999; (c) Carers and Disabled Children Act 2000; and (d) Carers (Equal Opportunities) Act 2004.


References:

1.Kröger, T. & Yeandle, S. (2013) Combining paid work and family care: policies and experiences in international perspective. University of Bristol: Policy Press.

2.OECD. (2011) Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-Term Care.

3.OECD. (2013) A Good Life in Old Age? Monitoring and Improving Quality in Long-term Care.

4.Riedel, M. & Kraus M. (2011) Informal care provision in Europe: regulations and profile of providers. ENEPRI Research No.96.


Hong Kong

5.Labour and Welfare Bureau. (2016a) 2016 Policy Address: Policy Initiatives of the Labour and Welfare Bureau.

6.Labour and Welfare Bureau. (2016b) Pilot Scheme on Living Allowance for Carers of the Elderly Persons from Low Income Families.

7.Legislative Council Secretariat. (2016) Background brief prepared by the Legislative Council Secretariat for the meeting on 15 February 2016: Pilot Scheme on Living Allowance for Carers of the Elderly Persons from Low Income Families.

8.Social Welfare Department. (2016) Pilot Scheme on Living Allowance for Carers of the Elderly Persons from Low Income Families.


Finland

9.Act on Supporting the Functional Capacity of the Older Population and on Social and Health Services for Older Persons 980/2012 (2012).

10.Family Carer Act 312/1992 (1992).

11.Kehusmaa, S. et al. (2013) Does informal care reduce public care expenditure on elderly care? Estimates based on Finland's Age Study. BMC Health Services Research.

12.Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland (2016).

13.TE Service. (2016) Job alternation leave.

14.The Central Association of Carers in Finland (2016).


United Kingdom

15.House of Commons Library. (2016) Briefing Paper: Carer's Allowance.

16.National Audit Office. (2009) Supporting Carers to Care.

17.Office for National Statistics (2016).