A 19/20-33(CM-29)

Legislative Council

Agenda

Wednesday 8 July 2020 at 11:00 am

I.
Laying of Papers on the Table of the Council

2 items of subsidiary legislation and 28 other papers to be laid on the Table of the Council set out in Appendix 1
Members to address the Council
Papers
1.
Hon Martin LIAO
2.
Hon Jeffrey LAM
3.
Hon CHAN Kin-por
4.
Hon Abraham SHEK
5.
Hon Dennis KWOK
6.
Hon Alice MAK
7.
Hon Kenneth LEUNG
8.
Hon Steven HO
9.
Hon CHAN Hak-kan
10.
Hon Tony TSE
11.
Hon KWONG Chun-yu
12.
Hon Wilson OR
13.
Hon CHUNG Kwok-pan
14.
Hon KWOK Wai-keung
15.
Hon CHEUNG Kwok-kwan

II.
Questions

Members to ask 22 questions (6 for oral replies and 16 for written replies)
Questions for oral replies to be asked by
Public officers to reply
1.
Secretary for Security
2.
Secretary for Development
3.
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
Under Secretary for Transport and Housing
4.
Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development
Under Secretary for Food and Health
Under Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
5.
Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development
Under Secretary for Food and Health
6.
Secretary for Labour and Welfare
Contents of 22 questions, Members to ask such questions and public officers to reply set out in Appendix 2

III.
Government Bills

Second Reading (debate to resume), consideration by committee of the whole Council and Third Reading
(Item 1 standing over from the meeting of 24 June 2020)
1.
:
Secretary for Labour and Welfare
Amendment movers
:
Secretary for Labour and Welfare
(Amendments set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 557/19-20 issued on 18 June 2020)

Hon Vincent CHENG
(Amendment set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 567/19-20 issued on 22 June 2020)
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 570/19-20 issued on 22 June 2020)
2.
:
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
Amendment mover
:
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
(Amendments set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 590/19-20 issued on 30 June 2020)
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 615/19-20 issued on 6 July 2020)
Amendment mover
:
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
(Amendments set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 589/19-20 issued on 29 June 2020)
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 614/19-20 issued on 3 July 2020)
4.
:
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
Amendment mover
:
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
(Amendments set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 587/19-20 issued on 24 June 2020)
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 616/19-20 issued on 6 July 2020)
5.
:
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
6.
:
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
Amendment mover
:
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
(Amendments set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 591/19-20 issued on 30 June 2020)
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 606/19-20 issued on 3 July 2020)
7.
:
Secretary for Food and Health
Amendment mover
:
Secretary for Food and Health
(Amendment set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 583/19-20 issued on 24 June 2020)
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 609/19-20 issued on 3 July 2020)
8.
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
Amendment mover
:
Secretary for Justice
(Amendment set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 584/19-20 issued on 24 June 2020)
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 610/19-20 issued on 3 July 2020)
10.
:
Secretary for Justice
Amendment mover
:
Secretary for Justice
(Amendments set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 585/19-20 issued on 24 June 2020)
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 613/19-20 issued on 3 July 2020)
11.
:
Secretary for Food and Health
12.
:
Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development
13.
:
Secretary for Transport and Housing
Amendment mover
:
Secretary for Transport and Housing
(Amendment set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 586/19-20 issued on 24 June 2020)
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 604/19-20 issued on 3 July 2020)

IV.
Members' Motions

1st debate (covering the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 20 May 2020)
1.
Motion under Rule 49B(1A) of the Rules of Procedure to censure Hon Claudia MO
Mover
:
Hon YUNG Hoi-yan
Wording of the motion
:
(This motion jointly signed by Hon Mrs Regina IP, Hon Alice MAK and Hon Vincent CHENG)
2nd debate (covering the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 20 May 2020)
2.
Motion under Rule 49B(1A) of the Rules of Procedure to censure Hon Dennis KWOK
Mover
:
Hon Alice MAK
Wording of the motion
:
(This motion jointly signed by Hon Mrs Regina IP, Dr Hon Priscilla LEUNG and Hon Holden CHOW)
3rd debate
(covering the following 2 motions on the incident of assaults which occurred in Yuen Long Station of West Rail Line of the MTR Corporation Limited on 21 July 2019 ("the 721 incident"))
(Standing over from the meeting of 23 October 2019)
3.
Motion under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint a select committee to conduct an inquiry
Mover
:
Hon LAM Cheuk-ting
Wording of the motion
:
4.
Motion under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint a select committee to conduct an inquiry
(This motion concerns both the 721 incident and the 831 incident)
Mover
:
Hon Claudia MO
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend this debate
:
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper Nos. CB(3) 195/19-20 and CB(3) 218/19-20 issued on 9 and 17 December 2019)
4th debate
(covering the following 3 motions on the incident of assaults which occurred in Prince Edward Station of the MTR Corporation Limited on 31 August 2019 ("the 831 incident") as well as the part concerning the 831 incident in Hon Claudia MO's motion in item 4)
(Standing over from the meeting of 23 October 2019)
5.
Motion under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon the Commissioner of Police, Director of Fire Services, Chairman of the MTR Corporation Limited ("MTRCL") and Operations Director of MTRCL to produce papers and testify
Mover
:
Hon Alvin YEUNG
Wording of the motion
:
6.
Motion under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon the Commissioner of Police, Director of Fire Services, Assistant Director (Ambulance) of the Fire Services Department, Chief Executive of the Hospital Authority, Hospital Chief Executive of Kwong Wah Hospital and Hospital Chief Executive of Princess Margaret Hospital to produce papers and testify
Mover
:
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Wording of the motion
:
7.
Motion under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint a select committee to conduct an inquiry
Mover
:
Hon KWONG Chun-yu
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend this debate
:
Secretary for Security
Secretary for Transport and Housing
Secretary for Food and Health
Under Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Food and Health
Under Secretary for Transport and Housing
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper Nos. CB(3) 195/19-20 and CB(3) 218/19-20 issued on 9 and 17 December 2019)
5th debate
(covering the following 7 motions on the Police's handling of protesters and persons performing duties in the protests during the "anti-extradition to China" movement)
(Items 8 to 12 standing over from the meeting of 23 October 2019)
8 and 9.
Motions under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint select committees to conduct inquiries
Mover
:
Hon Tanya CHAN
Wording of the motions
:
10 and 11.
Motions under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint select committees to conduct inquiries
Mover
:
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Wording of the motions
:
12.
Motion under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon the Secretary for Security and Secretary for Labour and Welfare to produce papers and testify
Mover
:
Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG
Wording of the motion
:
(Item 13 standing over from the meeting of 13 November 2019)
13.
Motion under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon the Secretary for Security and Commissioner of Police to produce papers and testify
Mover
:
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Wording of the motion
:
(Item 14 standing over from the meeting of 11 December 2019)
14.
Motion under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon the Commissioner of Police to produce papers and testify
Mover
:
Hon Kenneth LEUNG
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend this debate
:
Secretary for Labour and Welfare
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Labour and Welfare
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper Nos. CB(3) 195/19-20 and CB(3) 218/19-20 issued on 9 and 17 December 2019)
6th debate
(covering the following 2 motions on the causes and consequences of the social conflicts or disturbances arising from the amendments to the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance (Cap. 503) and related matters)
(Item 15 standing over from the meeting of 13 November 2019)
15.
Motion under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint a select committee to conduct an inquiry
Mover
:
Hon CHUNG Kwok-pan
Wording of the motion
:
(Item 16 standing over from the meeting of 27 November 2019)
16.
Motion under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint a select committee to conduct an inquiry
Mover
:
Dr Hon Priscilla LEUNG
Wording of the motion
:
Amendment mover
:
Hon James TO
(Amendment set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 155/19-20 issued on 22 November 2019)
Public officers to attend this debate
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper Nos. CB(3) 195/19-20 and CB(3) 218/19-20 issued on 9 and 17 December 2019)
Debate and voting arrangements for the following 4 motions to be notified
(Items 17 and 18 standing over from the meeting of 15 January 2020)
17.
Motion under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon the Secretary for Security and Commissioner of Police to produce papers and testify
Mover
:
Hon Charles Peter MOK
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
18.
Motion under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon the Secretary for Security and Secretary for Transport and Housing to produce papers and testify
Mover
:
Hon Jeremy TAM
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Security
Secretary for Transport and Housing
Under Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Transport and Housing
(Items 19 and 20 standing over from the meeting of 20 May 2020)
19.
Motion under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon the Chief Secretary for Administration and Secretary for Food and Health to produce papers and testify
Mover
:
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Food and Health
Under Secretary for Food and Health
20.
Motion under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon the Chief Secretary for Administration to produce papers and testify
Mover
:
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Food and Health
Under Secretary for Food and Health
7th debate (covering the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 12 June 2019)
21.
Motion on "No confidence in the Fifth Term Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region"
Mover
:
Hon Dennis KWOK
Wording of the motion
:
Amendment mover
:
Hon Claudia MO
(Amendment set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 667/18-19 issued on 5 June 2019)
Public officer to attend
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
8th debate (covering the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 3 June 2020)
22.
Motion on "Strengthening the combat against parallel trading activities, and tightening the arrangements for Mainland residents visiting Hong Kong"
Mover
:
Hon LAM Cheuk-ting
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development
Under Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development



Clerk to the Legislative Council





Appendix 1

Council meeting of 8 July 2020

Laying of Papers on the Table of the Council

Subsidiary legislation
Legal Notice No.
Other papers
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Independent Commission Against Corruption, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Annual Report 2019 and Reports of ICAC Advisory Committees

(to be presented by Hon Martin LIAO, Chairman of the Advisory Committee on Corruption of the Independent Commission Against Corruption, who will address the Council on this paper)
10.
ICAC Complaints Committee
Annual Report 2019

(to be presented by Hon Jeffrey LAM, Chairman of the Independent Commission Against Corruption Complaints Committee, who will address the Council on this paper)
11.
12.
Finance Committee Report on the examination of the Estimates of Expenditure 2020-2021
(to be presented by Hon CHAN Kin-por, Chairman of the Finance Committee, who will address the Council on this paper)
13.
Report of the Legislative Council Investigation Committee established under Rule 49B(2A) of the Rules of Procedure in respect of the motion to censure Hon Holden CHOW Ho-ding
(to be presented by Hon Abraham SHEK, Chairman of the Investigation Committee, who will address the Council on this paper)
14.
15.
Report of the Legislative Council Investigation Committee established under Rule 49B(2A) of the Rules of Procedure in respect of the motion to censure Hon HUI Chi-fung
(to be presented by Hon Alice MAK, Chairman of the Investigation Committee, who will address the Council on this paper)
16.
17.
Report of the Bills Committee on Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes (Amendment) Bill 2019
(to be presented by Hon Christopher CHEUNG, Chairman of the Bills Committee)
18.
Report of the Bills Committee on Pharmacy and Poisons (Amendment) Bill 2019
(to be presented by Hon Alice MAK, Chairman of the Bills Committee)
19.
Report of the Bills Committee on Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2019
(to be presented by Hon CHEUNG Kwok-kwan, Chairman of the Bills Committee)
20.
Report of the Bills Committee on Evidence (Amendment) Bill 2018
(to be presented by Hon CHEUNG Kwok-kwan, Chairman of the Bills Committee)
21.
Report of the Bills Committee on Broadcasting and Telecommunications Legislation (Amendment) Bill 2019
(to be presented by Hon Elizabeth QUAT, Chairman of the Bills Committee)
22.
Report of the Bills Committee on Road Traffic Legislation (Parking Spaces) (Amendment) Bill 2019
(to be presented by Hon Frankie YICK, Chairman of the Bills Committee)
23.
Report of the Panel on Environmental Affairs 2019-2020
(to be presented by Hon Steven HO, Deputy Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council on this paper)
24.
Report of the Panel on Security 2019-2020
(to be presented by Hon CHAN Hak-kan, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council on this paper)
25.
Report of the Panel on Development 2019-2020
(to be presented by Hon Tony TSE, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council on this paper)
26.
Report of the Panel on Welfare Services 2019-2020
(to be presented by Hon KWONG Chun-yu, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council on this paper)
27.
Report of the Panel on Housing 2019-2020
(to be presented by Hon Wilson OR, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council on this paper)
28.
Report of the Panel on Economic Development 2019-2020
(to be presented by Hon CHUNG Kwok-pan, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council on this paper)
29.
Report of the Panel on Public Service 2019-2020
(to be presented by Hon KWOK Wai-keung, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council on this paper)
30.
Report of the Panel on Constitutional Affairs 2019-2020
(to be presented by Hon CHEUNG Kwok-kwan, Chairman of the Panel, who will address the Council on this paper)





Appendix 2

22 questions to be asked at the Council meeting of 8 July 2020

Subject matters
Public officers to reply
Questions for oral replies
1
Hon CHU Hoi-dick
Secretary for Security
2
Hon Tony TSE
Secretary for Development
3
Hon Jimmy NG
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
Under Secretary for Transport and Housing
4
Hon KWOK Wai-keung
Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development
Under Secretary for Food and Health
Under Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
5
Hon YIU Si-wing
Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development
Under Secretary for Food and Health
6
Hon Michael TIEN
Secretary for Labour and Welfare
Questions for written replies
7
Ir Dr Hon LO Wai-kwok
Secretary for Transport and Housing
8
Hon Claudia MO
Secretary for Security
9
Hon Alice MAK
Secretary for the Civil Service
10
Hon LEUNG Che-cheung
Secretary for Development
11
Hon Mrs Regina IP
Secretary for Transport and Housing
12
Dr Hon Helena WONG
Secretary for Security
13
Hon Steven HO
Secretary for Transport and Housing
14
Hon LUK Chung-hung
Secretary for Labour and Welfare
15
Hon Jeremy TAM
Secretary for Security
16
Hon WONG Kwok-kin
Secretary for Food and Health
17
Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG
Secretary for Development
18
Hon HUI Chi-fung
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
19
Hon MA Fung-kwok
Secretary for Home Affairs
20
Hon SHIU Ka-chun
Secretary for Development
21
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Secretary for Transport and Housing
22
Hon IP Kin-yuen
Secretary for Education





Question 1
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Police officers' use of force in the form of chokeholds

Hon CHU Hoi-dick to ask:
In 2012, a police officer dragged a taxi driver into a police car by means of a chokehold, causing him to suffer from a cervical vertebra dislocation, and the man subsequently died. In handling the activities against the proposed legislative amendments in recent months, police officers often subdued demonstrators by means of kneeling on their necks. In May this year, a man who had been knelt on the neck died a day after his arrest. Regarding police officers' use of force in the form of chokeholds such as kneeling on one's neck, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the number of occasions, since January last year, on which police officers used force in the form of chokeholds to subdue arrestees, and the number of persons who sustained injuries or died consequently;
(2)
whether the Police has stipulated the circumstances under which police officers may use force in the form of chokeholds; if so, of the liabilities to be borne by a police officer for inappropriate use of such form of force which causes injuries or death to an arrestee; and
(3)
given that an incident in May this year in which an African American died after being knelt on the neck by a police officer in the United States has sparked nationwide protests, and the relevant authorities of a number of states and cities in the United States have subsequently banned the use of force in the form of chokeholds by police officers, whether the Hong Kong Government has plans to ban, by way of an executive order or enactment of legislation, the use of force in the form of chokeholds by police officers; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?





Question 2
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Contraventions relating to residences or properties of public officers

Hon Tony TSE to ask:
In recent years, unauthorized building works ("UBWs"), unauthorized occupation of government land or breach of the conditions of Government Land Licence in respect of the residences of politically appointed officials, senior officers of the Police Force, Executive Council Members, Legislative Council Members and District Council members or properties under their names, have been uncovered from time to time, raising doubts on the integrity of public officers and the credibility of the Government. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
as the Chief Secretary for Administration stated in January 2018 that the Chief Executive would remind all accountability officials that they must inspect their properties to see if illegal or UBWs issues were involved, whether such reminders are issued regularly or only at the time when the officials assume office;
(2)
given that in 2011, the Buildings Department ("BD") introduced a set of special procedure for handling celebrities' UBWs cases (i.e. expeditiously sending staff to inspect the sites and conducting investigations, so as to allay public concern), whether BD still adopts the procedure at present; if so, whether BD has assessed its effectiveness; if it has ceased to adopt the procedure, of the reasons for that; and
(3)
whether it will set up an inter-departmental task force comprising representatives of Government departments such as BD, the Lands Department, the Hong Kong Fire Services Department and the Rating and Valuation Department to expedite the handling of alleged contravention cases involving the residences of the aforesaid public officers or properties under their names, as well as proactively inspect such residences and properties, so as to ascertain if there is contravention of the law?





Question 3
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Demand-side management measures for the property market

Hon Jimmy NG to ask:
Owing to the economic downturn in Hong Kong, various trades are now facing tremendous operating pressure, and the banks also tend to be more prudent in commercial lending. Some owners of enterprises intend to sell their properties to meet cash flow needs. However, the various demand-side management measures for the property market (commonly referred to as "harsh measures") have greatly increased the difficulty in cashing out. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
as it is learnt that the Singapore Government intends to relax its demand-side management measures for the property market to attract international capital to invest in Singapore, thereby boosting its economy, whether the authorities have assessed this situation and considered, before this major competitor in the Asian region launches the relevant measures, lowering the rates of ad valorem stamp duty to the previous levels to enhance Hong Kong's competitiveness; and
(2)
as some business operators have suggested that even if the Government does not immediately "withdraw the harsh measures" in one go for fear of affecting the opportunities for members of the public to buy their own homes, it should at least implement the following three measures: (i) gradually lowering the ad valorem stamp duty rate from the current 15% to the previous levels; (ii) revising the arrangement under which a person, who replaces his/her property by acquiring a new residential property before disposing of his/her only original residential property, is required to pay the stamp duty first before they may apply for refund for the stamp duty paid; and (iii) "withdrawing the harsh measures" for non-residential property transactions, whether the authorities will implement these measures; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?





Question 4
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Measures to boost the economy

Hon KWOK Wai-keung to ask:
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 epidemic has dealt a heavy blow to Hong Kong's economy. In the first quarter of this year, the Gross Domestic Product contracted by a record of 8.9% in real terms from a year earlier and the unemployment rate also soared, hitting a new high in 10 years. Given that the epidemic has subsided recently, quite a number of members of the public hope that the Government can unite society and boost the economy. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
as the Chief Executive has indicated that she has appealed for a number of times to the landlords of private shop premises to reduce rents so as to ride out the hard times with their tenants but to little avail, of the Government's new measures to prompt those landlords to reduce rents, so as to lower the operating costs of the tenants;
(2)
whether it will consider, by drawing reference from the approach adopted by the Government when the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome epidemic was over in 2003, setting up an economic relaunch strategy group comprising government officials and non-government individuals, so as to bring together the strengths of the Government, the business sector and the community to jointly boost the economy; and
(3)
given that inbound tourism has come to a complete halt due to the epidemic, of the Government's new measures and strategies to promote local consumption so as to sustain the economic heat; whether it will launch a second-round of Cash Payout Scheme and consider afresh issuing consumption vouchers or providing consumption subsidies, so as to step up efforts to boost the economy?





Question 5
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Revitalizing the tourism industry

Hon YIU Si-wing to ask:
As the Coronavirus Disease 2019 ("COVID-19") epidemic has subsided recently, the authorities of Macao and Zhuhai have, since May this year, implemented a system for mutual recognition of health codes to facilitate residents' commuting between the two places. Meanwhile, the governments of some Southeast Asian countries, such as Thailand, have relaxed or planned to gradually relax the compulsory quarantine measures imposed on arrivals. On revitalizing the tourism industry, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
whether it has studied the ways to relax the entry restrictions imposed on Mainland and overseas residents, so as to permit the entry of residents from regions adjacent to Hong Kong where the epidemic has been brought under control; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(2)
of the Government's latest strategies to revitalize inbound and outbound tourism, and the timetable for the relevant work; and
(3)
given that the current fees payable by residents of Macao, Zhuhai and Shenzhen for undertaking the nucleic acid tests on COVID-19 are only $180, $75 and $160 (in local currencies), of the Government's measures to lower the test fees in Hong Kong which are over $1,000, so as to avoid the high fees impeding the re-activation of Hong Kong's inbound and outbound tourism?





Question 6
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

The Government Public Transport Fare Concession Scheme
for the Elderly and Eligible Persons with Disabilities

Hon Michael TIEN to ask:
The Government commissioned a consultant at the end of 2018 to conduct a comprehensive review on the Government Public Transport Fare Concession Scheme for the Elderly and Eligible Persons with Disabilities ("the $2 transport fare concession scheme"), which is expected to be completed in the middle of this year. The Government announced in January this year that the eligible age threshold for the Scheme would be lowered from 65 to 60, and that it had requested the consultant to draw up implementation options in the review report. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
whether the Government has received the review report; if so, of the specific recommendations and other details in the report; whether it will make public the report; if so, of the date; if it will not, the reasons for that;
(2)
given that the Government has had eight years of experience in implementing the $2 transport fare concession scheme, why the initiative of merely lowering the age threshold cannot be implemented immediately but has to wait for the consultant to put forward implementation options; whether there is a definite implementation date for the initiative; and
(3)
whether, prior to the implementation of the initiative, it will consider taking other measures to reduce the transport expenses of persons aged between 60 and 64, e.g. allowing them to use the Elder Octopus for enjoying the elderly fare concessions?





Question 7
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Smart mobility

Ir Dr Hon LO Wai-kwok to ask:
The Financial Secretary ("FS") announced in this financial year's Budget that the Innovation and Technology Bureau would publish the Smart City Blueprint for Hong Kong 2.0 within this year, and that FS had earmarked about $1 billion for the Smart Traffic Fund ("the Fund") to provide funding support for enterprises or organizations to conduct research and application on vehicle-related innovation and technology. Besides, the Transport Department ("TD") published in July 2019 a Smart Mobility Roadmap for Hong Kong, putting forward five key objectives of smart mobility initiatives, namely "Safe", "Informative", "Green", "Mobile" and "Accessible". In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
given that the Government is taking forward pilot projects on automated parking systems in Tsuen Wan, Sham Shui Po, Sheung Wan and Chai Wan, and the Urban Renewal Authority is studying the introduction of underground smart parking systems in Yau Ma Tei and Mong Kok, of the progress of the relevant work, and whether it will expeditiously study the introduction of smart car parks in other districts;
(2)
whether it will amend the relevant legislation and land leases to the effect that operators currently renting government land under short-term tenancies to operate public car parks are required to disseminate, before a specified deadline, real-time vacancy information of the car parking spaces of their car parks through "HKeMobility", a mobile application of TD; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(3)
given that quite a number of new-model vehicles are installed with various driver assistance systems (e.g. Collision Prevention Assist, Lane Keep Assist, Blind Spot Assist alerts, Stability Programme and Automatic Emergency Braking System), whether the Government will allocate funds from the Fund to subsidize vehicle owners to retrofit such systems in various types of existing vehicles in order to enhance road safety; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(4)
given that various road transport operators (including the operators of franchised buses, red minibuses and residents' buses, as well as the MTR Corporation Limited) have not yet fully opened up the real-time arrival information of their vehicles/trains, whether the Government will draw up a timetable for central dissemination of the relevant information by such operators through HKeMobility to facilitate members of the public to travel around; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(5)
given that in June 2019, TD kick-started the pilot intelligent traffic signal system project under which sensors were installed at signalized junctions to automatically detect real-time volume of vehicles and pedestrians flows so as to optimize signal time allocation, of the existing locations where intelligent traffic signal systems have been installed, and the effectiveness of such systems in improving the traffic flow so far; whether TD will expedite the installation of intelligent traffic signal systems at various road junctions; and
(6)
whether the implementation of the various initiatives to promote smart mobility and the construction of the relevant infrastructure facilities will be incorporated into the planning work for new development areas, so as to expedite the taking forward of smart mobility initiatives; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?





Question 8
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Immigration figures

Hon Claudia MO to ask:
Regarding immigration figures, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the monthly number of travellers, since November last year, who entered and exited Hong Kong via the various boundary control points, with a breakdown by traveller type (namely Hong Kong residents, Mainland travellers and other travellers);
(2)
of the respective numbers of applications submitted under the following schemes that the Government received and approved in each month since November last year: the Immigration Arrangements for Non-local Graduates, the Admission Scheme for Mainland Talents and Professionals, the Quality Migrant Admission Scheme, the Capital Investment Entrant Scheme, and the Technology Talent Admission Scheme; the number of approved applications the applicants of which have entered the territory and, among such applicants, the number of those who came from Hubei Province;
(3)
of the monthly number of Mainland residents, since November last year, who came to Hong Kong for settlement on Permits for Proceeding to Hong Kong and Macao (commonly known as "One-way Permits"), with a breakdown by place of household registration;
(4)
of the monthly number of Mainland travellers, since January this year, who visited Hong Kong, with a breakdown by the type of travel documents they held; and
(5)
of the total number of person-times, since the implementation of the regulations under which persons arriving at Hong Kong shall be subject to 14-day compulsory quarantine, of persons coming from the Mainland, Macao and Taiwan to visit Hong Kong each month who were exempted from complying with the relevant requirement, and a breakdown of the number by such places?





Question 9
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Creation of time-limited jobs

Hon Alice MAK to ask:
Hong Kong's economy has been dealt double blows by a series of demonstrations and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 epidemic, resulting in the unemployment rate rising continuously in recent months. The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate from February to April this year was 5.2%, and the unemployment rates of individual trades exceeded 10%. In view of the above, the relief measures introduced by the Government in April this year included the creation of around 30 000 time-limited jobs in both the public and private sectors in the coming two years. Such jobs include more than 200 positions for fresh graduates and 3 300 positions to support the city in fighting the epidemic. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the number of time-limited jobs that have been created so far, with a breakdown by trade, type of position, type of workplace and monthly salary range (each group spanning $5,000); among such jobs, the number of those created to support the fight against the epidemic;
(2)
as there are comments that the around 200 time-limited jobs are just a drop in the bucket for tens of thousands of fresh graduates each year, whether the Government will consider afresh increasing the number of such jobs; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(3)
whether it has drawn up a timetable for the creation of those jobs which have yet to be created; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
(4)
of the to-date number of private organizations with which it has discussed the creation of time-limited jobs, with a breakdown by trade, type of position and outcome of discussion?





Question 10
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Minor Works Control System

Hon LEUNG Che-cheung to ask:
The Minor Works Control System aims at facilitating building owners and occupiers to carry out small-scale building works lawfully and safely through simplified requirements. The Building Authority's prior approval of building plans and consent are not required before the commencement of minor works. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council, where a person who arranges for minor works to be carried out on any land (including property) is not the owner of the title to the land but merely an occupier, whether the person is required to, prior to commencement of the works, (i) obtain the consent of all owners of the titles to the land concerned, as well as (ii) consult nearby residents who will be affected by the works?





Question 11
(For written reply)

(Translation)

The MTR Corporation Limited's overseas railway business

Hon Mrs Regina IP to ask:
According to the Annual Report 2019 published by the MTR Corporation Limited ("MTRCL"), the financial performance of the South Western Railway of the United Kingdom last year continued to suffer for a number of reasons, and MTRCL therefore needed to set aside a provision of £43 million which amounted to its share of maximum potential loss under the relevant franchise agreement. In addition, while the MTR Express intercity railway service between Stockholm and Gothenburg, Sweden, operated by a wholly-owned subsidiary under MTRCL gained a steady patronage growth last year, it was still operating at a loss. Notwithstanding the unsatisfactory performance of the railway business it operated overseas, MTRCL continued to expand its overseas railway business, such as the Sydney Metro North West Line which commenced service in May last year. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council if it knows:
(1)
the profits or losses of MTRCL's overseas railway business recorded in each of the past five years;
(2)
the number of staff members sent overseas by MTRCL in the past five years to handle railway business, and their specific duties;
(3)
the percentage of its management resources currently allocated by MTRCL to its overseas railway business; the specific measures in place to ensure that the senior management staff of MTRCL will stay focused on local railway business, so that MTRCL will not miss the opportunity for development and thereby affecting the shareholders' return; and
(4)
how MTRCL assesses the return on its overseas railway business, and whether MTRCL has formulated any exit plan in respect of overseas railway projects that have recorded losses over a long period of time and are faced with bleak prospects; if MTRCL has, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?





Question 12
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Police officers' law enforcement actions involving the opposite sex

Dr Hon Helena WONG to ask:
It has been reported that in November last year and May this year, a number of male police officers entered the female public toilets at Chatham Road South in Tsim Sha Tsui and at Fa Yuen Street in Mong Kok respectively, and arrested several women therein. In addition, quite a number of demonstrators and arrestees, who had participated in the movement of opposition to the proposed legislative amendments, alleged that they had been sexually harassed or sexually assaulted by police officers. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
whether the guidelines issued by the Police to police officers have stipulated the circumstances under which they may enter toilets for the use of the opposite sex to enforce the law; if so, of the details, including whether it has been provided that they must be in the company of police officers of the opposite sex;
(2)
as it is stipulated in section 7 of the Public Conveniences (Conduct and Behaviour) Regulation (Cap. 132 sub. leg. BL) that no male person shall enter any part of any public convenience which is allocated for the use of female persons, and no female person shall enter any part of any public convenience which is allocated for the use of male persons, whether such requirement is applicable to those police officers who are enforcing the law; if so, whether the Police will take disciplinary actions against the aforesaid police officers; if not applicable, of the reasons for that;
(3)
of the number of incidents last year in which police officers entered public toilets for the use of the opposite sex to enforce the law, and the following details of each incident: (i) the date and time, (ii) the law enforcement action involved, (iii) the number of police officers involved, and the rank(s) and police district(s) to which they belonged, and (iv) whether the Police conducted any internal investigation subsequently (if so, of the latest progress);
(4)
of the number of complaints received by the Police last year about police officers' committing acts of sexual harassment and sexual assault when enforcing the law, as well as the following details of each case: (i) the nature of the complaint, (ii) the number of police officers involved, and the rank(s) and police district(s) to which they belonged, and (iii) the number of victims involved; and
(5)
whether it knows the number of complaints received by the Equal Opportunities Commission last year about police officers' committing acts of sexual harassment and sexual assault when enforcing the law, as well as the following details of each case: (i) the nature of the complaint, (ii) the number of police officers involved, and (iii) the number of victims involved?





Question 13
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Management of typhoon shelters

Hon Steven HO to ask:
Some vessel owners have relayed that the numbers of vessels of various types, particularly Class IV pleasure vessels, have been growing continuously in recent years. The authorities have stressed that the overall supply of sheltered spaces in Hong Kong waters is sufficient for meeting the estimated demand up till 2030, and the authorities have implemented several improvement measures. However, given the practices of the trade and a habit of berthing vessels at the homeport, most vessel owners choose to berth their vessels at the typhoon shelters within or near the urban areas, thus causing an acute shortage of berthing spaces in those typhoon shelters and conflicts among the persons-in-charge of different types of vessels from time to time over the use of such berthing spaces. On the other hand, the occupancy rates of some relatively remote typhoon shelters (e.g. Hei Ling Chau Typhoon Shelter and Yim Tin Tsai Typhoon Shelter) have all along been on the low side. Regarding the management of typhoon shelters, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the numbers of vessels berthing at the various typhoon shelters and sheltered anchorages during normal and inclement weather conditions in each month of the past three years, with a breakdown by type of vessel lengths permitted in the typhoon shelters;
(2)
of the current utilization of the Kwun Tong Typhoon Shelter by various types of vessels; the effectiveness of the authorities' measure of setting up a non-pleasure vessel mooring area in this typhoon shelter to achieve better mooring management; whether it will consult the trade again to introduce improvement measures;
(3)
of the details of the law enforcement actions taken in the past three years by the Marine Department ("MD") to combat the acts of profiteering from the berthing spaces in typhoon shelters, including (i) the number of inspections conducted, (ii) the number of complaints handled, (iii) the number of prosecutions instituted, and (iv) the number of convictions; whether MD has taken other measures to maintain the safe and orderly berthing of vessels within typhoon shelters;
(4)
whether the authorities will review and amend the Merchant Shipping (Local Vessels) (Typhoon Shelters) Regulation (Cap. 548E) so that the Director of Marine will be vested with more powers to immediately dispose of those vessels that have breached the mooring requirements in typhoon shelters; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
(5)
given that some fishermen have relayed to me that recently some people have used float lifts in some typhoon shelters for stowing pleasure vessels which are not in use temporarily, and that such equipment has obstructed watercourses and posed safety hazards to other vessels, of the details of the regulatory measures currently taken by MD against such equipment?





Question 14
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Government outsourced service contracts

Hon LUK Chung-hung to ask:
Regarding those government outsourced service contracts ("contracts") that rely heavily on the employment of non-skilled employees, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the numbers and total value of the contracts awarded by various government departments and the numbers of non-skilled employees involved, in each of the past three years, with a breakdown by the category of services (i.e. cleansing, security, and others) procured under the contracts;
(2)
of the following information from 1 May 2019 (i.e. the effective date of the prevailing statutory minimum wage rate) to 30 June 2020:
(A)
the respective numbers of non-skilled employees employed by the outsourced service contractors ("contractors") under the four major procuring departments (i.e. (i) Leisure and Cultural Services Department, (ii) Housing Department, (iii) Food and Environmental Hygiene Department and (iv) Government Property Agency) (set out in Table 1);
Table 1
Procuring departments(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)
Number of
non-skilled employees
    
(B)
a breakdown of the numbers in (A) by the range to which the hourly wages payable to non-skilled employees belonged (i.e. hourly wage (a) at $37.5 [equal to the statutory minimum wage], (b) between $37.6 and $39.5, (c) between $39.6 and $41.5, (d) between $41.6 and $43.5, (e) between $43.6 and $45.5, (f) between $45.6 and $47.5, (g) between $47.6 and $49.5, (h) between $49.6 and $51.5, (i) between $51.6 and $53.5, (j) at $53.6 or more, and (k) at a rate higher than the statutory minimum wage rate [which is equal to the total of (b) to (j)]), as pledged by the contractors in the tenders, and their respective percentages (set out in Table 2); and
Table 2
Range of hourly wages(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)
Number of employees%Number of employees%Number of employees%Number of employees%
(a)        
        
(k)        
Total 100 100 100 100
(C)
in respect of each of the ranges of hourly wages mentioned in (B), a breakdown of the following figures by the category of services (i.e. cleansing, security, and others) provided by the non-skilled employees: the number of such employees employed by the contractors under each of such departments, the subtotals of these numbers and the relevant percentages, and (X) the year-on-year rates of change of such subtotals (set out in Table 3);
Table 3
Range of hourly wagesCleansing serviceSecurity serviceOther servicesTotal%
(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)Subtotal%(X)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)Subtotal%(X)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)Subtotal%(X)
(a)                       
                       
(k)                       
Total     100      100      100  100
(3)
of the details of the re-tendering exercises for the outsourced services concerned which were/will be conducted by the four aforesaid major procuring departments last year and this year, including the names of the contractors before tenders were/are invited, the commencement dates of the new contracts and the service districts involved, as well as the names of the successful contractors;
(4)
given that the Government announced on 10 October 2018 that it would introduce a number of new measures which aim at enhancing the protection of the employment terms and conditions as well as labour benefits of non-skilled workers, but these new measures and the transitional arrangements concerned are not applicable to contracts awarded before that date of announcement, of the number of such contracts which have not yet expired at present and the percentage of such contracts in the total number of contracts; of the expected completion dates of the re-tendering exercises for the outsourced services concerned;
(5)
whether it will consider providing subsidies for the non-skilled employees employed under the contracts mentioned in (4), so as to compensate them for the differences between their remuneration packages and those stipulated under existing contracts; and
(6)
given that at present, a non-skilled employee with no less than one year's continuous service under a Standard Employment Contract of a government outsourced service contract is entitled to a contractual gratuity, whether the Government will consider relaxing the relevant restrictions (e.g. affording those employees who have less than one year's service when their employment is terminated contractual gratuities calculated on a pro rata basis), so as to eradicate evasion of payment of contractual gratuities by employers through early termination of contracts?





Question 15
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Police officers giving evidence in court proceedings

Hon Jeremy TAM to ask:
It has been reported that recently, during the trial of a case of assault on a police officer, a Magistrate stated that the police officer who gave evidence was not an honest and reliable witness, and thus acquitted the defendant of the charge. On the other hand, according to section 31 of the Crimes Ordinance (Cap. 200), any person lawfully sworn as a witness in a judicial proceeding who makes a false statement shall be guilty of perjury. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the number of police officers in the past five years who were regarded by the courts as not being honest and reliable witnesses, together with the rationale of the courts;
(2)
of the number of police officers referred to in (1) who were subject to disciplinary actions upon investigations, and set out one by one the misconduct involved and the disciplinary actions imposed on them;
(3)
of the number of police officers who were prosecuted in the past five years for allegedly giving false evidence and, among them, the number of officers convicted and the punishments imposed on them;
(4)
of the measures put in place to ensure that police officers collect evidence honestly during criminal investigations and give evidence honestly in court proceedings;
(5)
of the number of police officers, who had been regarded by the courts as not being honest and reliable witnesses, giving evidence in the past five years in other cases;
(6)
whether it will set up, for the reference of the courts, a database on cases involving police officers being regarded by the courts as not honest and reliable witnesses, and prohibit the police officers concerned from giving evidence in other cases; and
(7)
given that during the recent trials of a number of criminal cases in relation to social incidents, the Department of Justice ("DoJ") applied to the courts for the issue of anonymity orders in respect of those police officers who gave evidence, whether DoJ will adopt the following practice: in the event that a police officer who gave evidence has been regarded by the court as not being an honest and reliable witness, DoJ will, on account of public interest, consider applying to the court for revoking the relevant anonymity order?





Question 16
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Setting up more hawker pitches and bazaars

Hon WONG Kwok-kin to ask:
As Hong Kong's economy has been dealt double blows by the social disturbances in the latter half of last year and the epidemic which broke out at the beginning of this year, the unemployment rate has hit a record high in 10 years. Some members of the public have relayed that the Government should proactively create job opportunities, such as by suitably allowing the setting up of more hawker pitches and bazaars. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
as the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department ("FEHD") launched in September last year a scheme of Reallocation of 435 Vacant Fixed Hawker Pitches and Issue of New Licences, whether FEHD has completed reallocating the pitches and issuing the licences, and the total number of pitches reallocated so far; of the number of persons, among those issued with a licence, who fall into the following category: members of the public satisfying certain basic criteria;
(2)
whether FEHD will review the above scheme and report the outcome to the relevant panel of this Council; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
(3)
whether, in the coming three years, it has plans to set up bazaars and new hawker pitches at suitable sites (e.g. the open space adjacent to Wong Tai Sin Temple) in various districts across the territory, and to issue temporary hawker licences, so as to create job opportunities; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?





Question 17
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Statistics on the work of the Urban Renewal Authority

Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG to ask:
Regarding the statistics on the work of the Urban Renewal Authority ("URA"), will the Government inform this Council if it knows:
(1)
the following information on each of the redevelopment projects for which the work on acquisition and rehousing was completed in the financial years from 2010-2011 to 2019-2020 (set out in Table 1 by project name):
(a)
the number of households at the time of the Freezing Survey, with a breakdown by category of occupiers (i.e. (i) owner-occupiers, (ii) domestic tenants, (iii) occupiers of rooftop structures, and (iv) others), and
(b)
the number of households who were offered rehousing or compensation, with a breakdown by the following arrangements made for them: (v) being rehoused in the public rental housing units provided by the Hong Kong Housing Authority, (vi) being rehoused in the public rental housing units provided by the Hong Kong Housing Society, (vii) being rehoused in the units of the rehousing blocks under URA, (viii) being offered the basic ex-gratia payment, (ix) being offered a compensation in the form of an ex gratia payment equivalent to three times the ex-gratia allowance offered by the Lands Department on resumption (because they were ineligible for the basic ex-gratia payment), and (x) being offered a compensation in the form of an ex-gratia payment equivalent to two times the ex gratia allowance offered by the Lands Department on resumption (because they moved in after the date of the Freezing Survey or due to other reasons);
Table 1
Financial yearProject numberProject name(a)(b)
(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)Total(v)(vi)(vii)(viii)(ix)(x)
              
(2)
the following information on the various types of units in the rehousing blocks under URA (i.e. (a) one-person unit (with shared kitchen), (b) one-person unit (with independent kitchen), (c) two person unit (with shared kitchen), (d) two-person unit (with independent kitchen), and (e) family unit) in each of the financial years from 2010-2011 to 2019-2020 (set out in Table 2):
(i)
the number of units,
(ii)
the smallest and the largest usable areas of such units,
(iii)
the lowest and the highest rents for such units (excluding those units used as transitional housing),
(iv)
the number of units occupied,
(v)
the number of vacant units available for allocation to tenants affected by redevelopment, and
(vi)
the number of units leased to or reserved for social welfare organizations;
Table 2
Type of unit Shun Sing MansionRich BuildingBedford Tower12 Soy Street, Mong Kok
(a)(i)    
(ii)    
(iii)    
(iv)    
(v)    
(vi)    
     
(3)
in each of the redevelopment projects for which the work on acquisition and rehousing was completed in the financial years from 2010-2011 to 2019-2020, the number of units used for non-residential purposes at the time of the Freezing Survey, with a breakdown by:
(a)
the type of units (i.e. (i) ground level unit, (ii) exit staircase shop, (iii) cockloft unit, (iv) upstairs unit, and (v) others),
(b)
the category of occupiers (i.e. (vi) owner, (vii) tenant, (viii) occupier, and (ix) others), and
(c)
the nature of business operations (i.e. (x) retail, (xi) eatery, (xii) workshop, (xiii) service, (xiv) office, and (xv) others);
(set out in Table 3 by project name); and
Table 3
Financial yearProject numberProject name(a)(b)(c)
(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)Total(vi)(vii)(viii)(ix)(x)(xi)(xii)(xiii)(xiv)(xv)
                   
(4)
in respect of each of the redevelopment projects completed in the financial years from 2010-2011 to 2019-2020, the following details of the applications made by the affected shop operators for renting the shop premises provided in the completed redevelopment projects under the "Local Shop Arrangement" implemented by URA (set out in Table 4 by project name):
(i)
the number and percentage of shop operators who made such applications,
(ii)
the number of shop operators who signed a tenancy agreement,
(iii)
the shortest and the longest terms of the tenancy agreements signed for the first time,
(iv)
whether rental concessions were offered to the shop operators, and
(v)
the details of the rental concessions (if any)?
Table 4
Financial yearProject numberProject name(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)
        





Question 18
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Predicate offences for money laundering involving environmental crimes

Hon HUI Chi-fung to ask:
The Financial Action Task Force ("FATF") comprises 39 major economies of the world, including Hong Kong. In its Mutual Evaluation Report of Hong Kong ("the Report") published in 2008 and its Follow-up Report published in 2012, FATF pointed out that the predicate offences for money laundering ("predicate offences") in Hong Kong had not adequately covered environmental crimes. In its Report published in 2019, FATF pointed out that Hong Kong had made relevant legislative amendments in May 2018. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the details and latest progress of the Government's efforts, since 2008, in rendering environmental crimes as predicate offences;
(2)
of the details of those predicate offence cases involving environmental crimes which were detected by relevant government departments in each of the past five years, including (i) the number of cases, (ii) the total amount of money laundered, and (iii) the total value of assets frozen (if applicable), with a tabulated breakdown by type of environmental crime (e.g. (a) emission of pollutants, (b) smuggling of endangered wild animals, (c) smuggling of endangered species of plants, (d) illegal logging, and (e) illegal fishing); and
(3)
whether the Government has plans to render, by making reference to the practice of other jurisdictions which have currently included environmental crimes as predicate offences, the various environmental crimes as predicate offences; if so, of the timetable; if not, the reasons for that?





Question 19
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Support for private museums

Hon MA Fung-kwok to ask:
Earlier on, the Legislative Council Secretariat has, at my request, conducted a study on the support policies for private museums in overseas places. The findings of the study show that private museums in the United States ("US") and the United Kingdom ("UK") are provided with various policy and financial support by their governments. In comparison, among over 35 existing private museums in Hong Kong, most of them have not been provided with any direct support by the Government. There have been comments that such a situation is not conducive to the preservation and diversified development of culture. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the measures currently in place to support private museums, including whether it has assisted such museums in their promotional work targeted at members of the public in Hong Kong and overseas tourists; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(2)
of the details of the support provided by the Government for individual private museums in the past three years, including the names of such museums, and the specific details of the support; and
(3)
whether it will consider, by drawing reference from the practices adopted by the US and UK authorities, (i) encouraging and supporting private museums in Hong Kong to establish their own accreditation regime and implement an accreditation scheme, and (ii) formulating policies and measures for supporting private museums, e.g. disbursing direct financial assistance, providing technical support, as well as regarding donations to private museums as a deduction allowable in tax assessment; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?





Question 20
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Redevelopment projects implemented
by the Urban Renewal Authority

Hon SHIU Ka-chun to ask:
According to the policy of the Urban Renewal Authority ("URA"), when URA holds discussions with the owners of the properties in a redevelopment project regarding the market value of their properties in the acquisition offers made to them, it will take into consideration the valuation reports on the market value of the properties ("valuation reports") submitted by professional surveyors who were appointed by the owners on their own ("owner-appointed surveyors"). On the other hand, in the event that URA cannot reach an agreement with the property owners on the acquisition of property titles due to such issues as the acquisition prices and vesting of titles, it may, under the Urban Renewal Authority Ordinance (Cap. 563), apply to the Government for resumption, under the Lands Resumption Ordinance (Cap. 124), by the Government of those property titles which have not been acquired so that those titles will revert to the Government. If such an application has been approved, the Lands Department will offer relevant compensation to the affected persons. If the two parties cannot reach an agreement on the amount of compensation, the affected persons may apply to the Lands Tribunal for determining the amount of compensation to be offered. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
whether it knows the following information about the various redevelopment projects implemented by URA in the past 10 years: (i) the number of units acquired, (ii) the number of units which involved the submission of valuation reports by owner-appointed surveyors, and (iii) the number of units which involved revision of the acquisition offers by URA having regard to the valuation reports submitted by owner-appointed surveyors, with a breakdown by whether such properties were (a) residential or (b) non-residential properties in the following table;
Name of project(a)(b)
(i)(ii)(iii)(i)(ii)(iii)
       
(2)
of the following information about the redevelopment projects implemented by URA in the past 10 years which involved the Government's invoking of Cap. 124: (i) the number of units resumed by invoking Cap. 124, (ii) the number of units which involved the affected persons applying to the Lands Tribunal for determining the amount of compensation, and (iii) the number of units which involved the determination by the Lands Tribunal that the amount of compensation had to be adjusted, and set out a breakdown by whether such properties were (a) residential or (b) non-residential properties in a table of the same format as the table above; and
(3)
whether it knows the criteria adopted by URA for deciding whether or not to (i) accept the valuation reports submitted by owner-appointed surveyors, and (ii) revise the acquisition offers; whether it will request URA to review the relevant mechanism to better protect the rights and interests of property owners?





Question 21
(For written reply)

(Translation)

External transport for Tuen Mun

Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki to ask:
Some Tuen Mun residents have relayed that as Tuen Mun Road, being the major trunk road connecting Tuen Mun to other areas, has rather high volume of traffic, and traffic accidents frequently occur, severe traffic congestions often happen there. On the 12th of last month, two traffic accidents happened on that road on the same day, causing serious traffic jams with tailbacks reaching as long as 10 kilometres, much to the agony of the local residents. Regarding the external transport for Tuen Mun, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the design maximum capacity of Tuen Mun Road and, as anticipated by the authorities when constructing the road, the average daily peak hour and non-peak hour traffic volumes of the road in the 10th and the 20th years after its commissioning;
(2)
of the following information on Tuen Mun Road in each of the past three years:
(i)
the morning peak hour traffic volume,
(ii)
the morning peak hour traffic volume/capacity ("v/c") ratio,
(iii)
the non-peak hour traffic volume,
(iv)
the non-peak hour traffic v/c ratio, and
(v)
the average daily traffic volume;
(3)
of the number of traffic accidents which happened on Tuen Muen Road and the resultant casualties, in each of the past three years;
(4)
of (i) the number of incidents of traffic jams which were caused by traffic accidents, (ii) the average and the longest duration of the traffic jams, and (iii) the average and the longest lengths of the tailbacks, on Tuen Mun Road in each of the past three years;
(5)
of the works projects to be implemented and other ways to be adopted in the coming five years to alleviate the problem of traffic congestion on Tuen Mun Road;
(6)
of the latest anticipated commissioning date of the Northern Connection of Tuen Mun-Chek Lap Kok Link ("TM-CLKL"); in the estimation by the authorities, (i) the v/c ratios on Tuen Mun Road during peak hours, and (ii) the reduction in the traffic volume per hour when compared with the pre-commissioning figure, in the first five years after the commissioning of the Northern Connection of TM-CLKL;
(7)
of the (i) maximum traffic volumes, (ii) peak hour traffic volumes per hour, and (iii) average daily traffic volumes, in the first five years after the commissioning of the Northern Connection of TM-CLKL, as anticipated by the authorities when designing the road; and
(8)
in addition to the commissioning of the Northern Connection of TM-CLKL, of the authorities' plans in the coming five years to improve the external transport for Tuen Mun, and whether such plans include:
(i)
planning for the construction of additional roads to connect Tuen Mun to the urban areas,
(ii)
resuming the ferry services between Central and Tuen Mun,
(iii)
planning for the construction of additional railways to connect Tuen Mun to the urban areas,
(iv)
enhancing the franchised bus services between Tuen Mun and the urban areas, with a view to attracting motorists commuting to and from Tuen Mun by bus instead, and
(v)
prompting the reduction in the tolls of Tai Lam Tunnel with a view to making optimal use of its unused capacity;
if so, of the progress; if not, whether they will commence feasibility studies for such plans?





Question 22
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Restricting students' freedom of expression

Hon IP Kin-yuen to ask:
The Convention on the Rights of the Child ("the Convention"), which has been applicable to Hong Kong since 1994, stipulates under paragraph 1 of Article 13 that "[t]he child shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds…either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of the child's choice", and under paragraph 1(b) of Article 29 that States Parties unanimously agree that the education of the child shall be directed to "[t]he development of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and for the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations". On the other hand, on 10 June this year, the Secretary for Education ("the Secretary") wrote to the principals of all primary and secondary schools in Hong Kong, requesting them to counsel their students to stop "chanting slogans, forming human chains, and posting slogans or singing songs which contain political messages at schools for expressing political stance", and stated that "if individual students refuse to comply with the instructions after repeated persuasion, schools should take appropriate counseling and disciplinary actions according to the school-based mechanism". In addition, when the Secretary was asked at a radio interview on 11 June whether students might play and sing the songs from the musical Les Misérables at school music competitions, he responded that it would depend on the circumstances and the purpose at the time. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
whether it has assessed if the aforesaid request made by the Secretary to the principals of primary and secondary schools has constituted a restriction on students' freedom of expression, thereby violating the aforesaid provisions in the Convention under which the child shall enjoy such right; if it has assessed and the outcome is in the negative, of the justifications for that;
(2)
whether it has assessed if "listening to the views of the students" is one of the indispensable elements in good school-based management practices; if it has assessed and the outcome is in the affirmative, why the Education Bureau ("EDB") has requested schools to counsel students to stop expressing political stance; of the measures in place to ensure that students may express themselves freely without fear;
(3)
of the criteria based on which EDB determines whether the songs played and sung by students at schools are political promotion or political propaganda in nature;
(4)
under what circumstances or for what purpose that students playing and singing songs at schools will be regarded by EDB as conducting political promotion or political propaganda;
(5)
whether students playing and singing The Internationale or Bloodstained Elegance (a military song of the People's Liberation Army) at schools will be regarded by EDB as conducting political promotion or political propaganda; and
(6)
given that since the 1980s, it has been recognized across the globe that forming human chains is a peaceful way to express an array of aspirations (apart from political promotion or political propaganda, such aspirations include raising funds to fight hunger, advocating world peace, striving for debt forgiveness for developing nations, fighting for gender equality), and that some local pro-establishment organizations initiated a human chain activity in 2016 in which a large number of children took part, whether EDB prohibits, in a broad-brush manner, students from forming human chains inside and outside schools?