A 19/20-4

Legislative Council

Agenda

Wednesday 30 October 2019 at 11:00 am

I.
Papers to be laid on the Table of the Council

8 items of subsidiary legislation/instruments and 10 other papers to be laid on the Table of the Council set out in Appendix 1

II.
Questions

Members to ask 20 questions (6 for oral replies and 14 for written replies)
(Standing over from the meeting of 10 July 2019)
Questions for oral replies to be asked by
Public officers to reply
1.
Secretary for Innovation and Technology
2.
Secretary for Security
3.
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development
4.
Hon Wilson OR
Secretary for Food and Health
5.
Secretary for Labour and Welfare
6.
Secretary for Food and Health
Contents of 20 questions, Members to ask such questions and public officers to reply set out in Appendix 2

III.
Government Bills

First Reading and Second Reading (debate to be adjourned)
1.
:
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
2.
:
Secretary for Food and Health
Consideration by committee of the whole Council and Third Reading
3.
Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Tax Concessions) Bill 2019
(Standing over from the meeting of 26 June 2019)
:
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury to move amendments as set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 26/19-20 issued on 15 October 2019

(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 59/19-20 issued on 22 October 2019)
Second Reading (debate to resume), consideration by committee of the whole Council and Third Reading
(Standing over from the meeting of 10 July 2019)
5.
:
Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs
Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs to move an amendment as set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 13/19-20 issued on 9 October 2019

IV.
Government Motions

1st debate (to deal with the following 2 motions)
(Standing over from the meeting of 10 July 2019)
1.
Proposed resolution under Article 73(7) of the Basic Law and section 7A of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance (Cap. 484) on appointment of a judge
Mover
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
Wording of the motion
:
2.
Proposed resolution under Article 73(7) of the Basic Law on appointment of a judge
Mover
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
Wording of the motion
:
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper Nos. CB(3) 760/18-19 and CB(3) 55/19-20 issued on 27 June and 21 October 2019)

V.
Members' Motions on Subsidiary Legislation/Instruments

1st debate (to deal with the following motion)
1.
Proposed resolution to extend the period for amending subsidiary legislation
Mover
:
Hon Kenneth LEUNG
Wording of the motion
:
2nd debate (to deal with the following motion)
2.
Proposed resolution to extend the period for amending subsidiary legislation
Mover
:
Hon WONG Ting-kwong
Wording of the motion
:

VI.
Member's Bill

First Reading and Second Reading (debate to be adjourned)
1.
St. John's College (Amendment) Bill 2019
(Standing over from the meeting of 10 July 2019)
:
Hon Jimmy NG

VII.
Members' Motions (not including those on Subsidiary Legislation/Instruments)

1st debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 10 July 2019)
1.
Motion under Article 73(9) of the Basic Law to form an independent investigation committee to investigate the charges against the Chief Executive for serious breach of law and/or dereliction of duty
Mover
:
Hon Alvin YEUNG
Wording of the motion
:
(This motion jointly initiated by 25 Members: Hon Alvin YEUNG, Hon James TO, Hon LEUNG Yiu-chung, Prof Hon Joseph LEE, Hon Claudia MO, Hon WU Chi-wai, Hon Charles Peter MOK, Hon CHAN Chi-chuen, Hon Kenneth LEUNG, Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki, Hon Dennis KWOK, Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG, Dr Hon Helena WONG, Hon IP Kin-yuen, Hon Andrew WAN, Hon CHU Hoi-dick, Hon LAM Cheuk-ting, Hon SHIU Ka-chun, Hon Tanya CHAN, Hon HUI Chi-fung, Dr Hon CHENG Chung-tai, Hon KWONG Chun-yu, Hon Jeremy TAM, Hon Gary FAN and Hon AU Nok-hin)
Public officer to attend
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
2nd debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 23 October 2019)
2.
Motion under Rule 49B(1A) of the Rules of Procedure to censure Dr Hon Junius HO
Mover
:
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Wording of the motion
:
(This motion jointly signed by Hon Alvin YEUNG, Hon Tanya CHAN and Hon Jeremy TAM)
3rd debate (to deal with the following motion)
3.
Motion under Rule 49B(1A) of the Rules of Procedure to censure Dr Hon Junius HO
Mover
:
Hon Claudia MO
Wording of the motion
:
(This motion jointly signed by Hon CHU Hoi-dick, Hon CHAN Chi-chuen and Hon Gary FAN)
4th debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 12 June 2019)
4.
Motion under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon persons concerned to produce papers and testify
Mover
:
Hon Dennis KWOK
Wording of the motion
:
Public officer to attend
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
5th debate (to deal with the following 2 motions)
(Standing over from the meeting of 10 July 2019)
5.
Motion under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon a person to produce papers and testify
Mover
:
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Wording of the motion
:
6.
Motion under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint a select committee to conduct an inquiry
Mover
:
Hon AU Nok-hin
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend items 5 and 6
:
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 771/18-19 issued on 27 June 2019)
(Standing over from the meeting of 23 October 2019)
Motions under Article 73(5) and (10) of the Basic Law to summon persons to produce papers and testify
7.
Mover
:
Hon Alvin YEUNG
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Security
Secretary for Transport and Housing
Under Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Transport and Housing
8.
Mover
:
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Security
Secretary for Food and Health
Under Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Food and Health
9.
Mover
:
Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Labour and Welfare
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Labour and Welfare
6th debate (to deal with the following 2 motions)
(Standing over from the meeting of 3 July 2019)
Motions under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint select committees to conduct inquiries
10.
Mover
:
Hon Andrew WAN
Wording of the motion
:
11.
Mover
:
Hon Jeremy TAM
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend items 10 and 11
:
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
(Debate and voting arrangements set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 723/18-19 issued on 19 June 2019)
(Standing over from the meeting of 23 October 2019)
Motions under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint select committees to conduct inquiries
12.
Mover
:
Hon Claudia MO
Wording of the motion
:
13 and 14.
Mover
:
Hon Tanya CHAN
Wording of the motions
:
15 and 16.
Mover
:
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Wording of the motions
:
17.
Mover
:
Hon LAM Cheuk-ting
Wording of the motion
:
18.
Mover
:
Hon KWONG Chun-yu
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend items 12 to 18
:
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
7th debate (to deal with the following motion)
19.
Motion under the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance to appoint a select committee to conduct an inquiry
Mover
:
Hon Gary FAN
Wording of the motion
:
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Security
Under Secretary for Security
8th debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 12 June 2019)
20.
Motion on "No confidence in the Fifth Term Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region"
Mover
:
Hon Dennis KWOK
Wording of the motion
:
Amendment mover
:
Hon Claudia MO
(Amendment set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 667/18-19 issued on 5 June 2019)
Public officer to attend
:
Chief Secretary for Administration
9th debate (to deal with the following motion)
(Standing over from the meeting of 12 June 2019)
21.
Motion on "Ensuring children's right to play for them to grow up happily"
Mover
:
Hon HO Kai-ming
Wording of the motion
:
5 amendment movers
:
Hon IP Kin-yuen, Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki, Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG, Dr Hon CHIANG Lai-wan and Hon HUI Chi-fung
(Amendments set out in LC Paper No. CB(3) 669/18-19 issued on 6 June 2019)
Public officers to attend
:
Secretary for Labour and Welfare
Under Secretary for Labour and Welfare


* The order of debates on the motions concerned may be adjusted having regard to the debate arrangements to be made


Clerk to the Legislative Council





Appendix 1

Council meeting of 30 October 2019

Papers to be laid on the Table of the Council

Subsidiary legislation/instruments
No.
1.
Legal Notice 150 of 2019
2.
Legal Notice 151 of 2019
3.
Legal Notice 152 of 2019
4.
Legal Notice 153 of 2019
5.
Legal Notice 154 of 2019
6.
Legal Notice 155 of 2019
7.
Legal Notice 156 of 2019
8.
Special Supplement No. 5 to Gazette No. 43/2019
Other papers
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.





Appendix 2

20 questions to be asked at the Council meeting of 30 October 2019

Subject matters
Public officers to reply
Questions for oral replies
1
Hon Martin LIAO
Secretary for Innovation and Technology
2
Prof Hon Joseph LEE
Secretary for Security
3
Hon Paul TSE
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development
4
Hon Wilson OR
Secretary for Food and Health
5
Hon Elizabeth QUAT
Secretary for Labour and Welfare
6
Hon Holden CHOW
Secretary for Food and Health
Questions for written replies
7
Hon Starry LEE
Secretary for Security
8
Hon Alvin YEUNG
Secretary for Security
9
Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki
Secretary for Food and Health
10
Hon Martin LIAO
Secretary for Transport and Housing
11
Hon Tanya CHAN
Secretary for Security
12
Hon CHAN Han-pan
Secretary for the Civil Service
13
Hon Tommy CHEUNG
Secretary for Education
14
Hon YUNG Hoi-yan
Secretary for Food and Health
15
Hon CHAN Kin-por
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury
16
Hon HUI Chi-fung
Secretary for Security
17
Hon Steven HO
Secretary for the Environment
18
Hon IP Kin-yuen
Secretary for Education
19
Hon Vincent CHENG
Secretary for Labour and Welfare
20
Hon LEUNG Yiu-chung
Secretary for Labour and Welfare
Note:
Only 14 written questions are scheduled for this meeting, as Hon KWOK Wai-keung and Hon SHIU Ka-fai have withdrawn their written questions.





Question 1
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Forward-looking and competitive policies on
attracting innovation and technology talents

Hon Martin LIAO to ask:
In recent years, the Government has been committed to developing Hong Kong into an international innovation and technology ("I&T") hub, as well as continuously enhancing policies on and measures for attracting talents outside Hong Kong to come here for work, with a view to maintaining Hong Kong's edges amid the keen international competition for talents. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
given that the Government has, since last year, provided through the Quality Migrant Admission Scheme immigration facilitation to eligible persons under the Talent List of Hong Kong, and launched the Technology Talent Admission Scheme, of the respective numbers of applications from I&T talents for working in Hong Kong received, approved and rejected by the Government so far under these two initiatives; in respect of the approved cases, of the number of talents who are currently in Hong Kong and those who will come to Hong Kong within this year, the nationalities and places of origin of the persons concerned, as well as the time taken to vet and approve such cases; whether it has evaluated the effectiveness of such initiatives, including if the number of talents who have been granted entry approval as well as their expertise and qualifications meet the expectations;
(2)
given that authorities of overseas places and nearby municipalities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area ("Greater Bay Area") adjust from time to time their policies on and strategies for attracting outside talents, whether the Government has grasped and assessed the latest situation, reviewed and enhanced the talent admission arrangements of Hong Kong correspondingly, and introduced new schemes or measures to attract I&T talents, with a view to strengthening Hong Kong's competitiveness in this regard; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
(3)
of the Government's short and medium term targets on attracting the various types of I&T talents from outside Hong Kong; given that the I&T development in Hong Kong is one of the integral parts in developing the Greater Bay Area into an international I&&T hub, how the Government ensures that Hong Kong and other municipalities in the Greater Bay Area will complement, and will not compete viciously with, one another in attracting I&T talents? 





Question 2
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Use of emergency ambulance service

Prof Hon Joseph LEE to ask:
A large group of demonstrators surrounded the Police Headquarters ("PHQ") for the whole day of 21 June this year, barring entry and exit of vehicles and persons. At night of that day, some persons inside PHQ reported feeling unwell and called emergency ambulance service. The Police subsequently accused that the demonstrators' blocking the roads had delayed the rescue work. However, it has been reported that the Police refused to clear the way for the ambulances which had arrived in the vicinity of PHQ, and only after a protracted period of time did they open the eastern entrance gate of PHQ for entry of the ambulancemen. Furthermore, some of the persons who had been conveyed to the accident and emergency ("A&E") department by ambulance left without receiving diagnoses and treatments. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the reasons why the Police refused to clear the way for the ambulances;
(2)
of the respective durations between the ambulances' arrival in the vicinity of PHQ and their departure upon picking up the various persons who reported feeling unwell; and
(3)
whether it has assessed, among the aforesaid persons who were conveyed to the A&E department by ambulance, the number of those who had a genuine need for receiving emergency diagnoses and treatments, and if emergency ambulance service had been abused?





Question 3
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Impacts of recent political situation

Hon Paul TSE to ask:
Since June this year, tens of thousands of people took to the street for many times to protest against the proposals to amend the law concerning surrender of fugitive offenders, and to demand the Chief Executive and relevant officials to take responsibility by stepping down. Some demonstrators blocked roads, besieged government buildings and clashed with the Police on a number of occasions. There are comments that the aforesaid situation shows that there is a serious dissension within society and a complete loss of mutual trust between the Government and the people. Also, disputes and agitation in society have caused instability in the economy as well as anxiety in people's mind. For example, a developer gave up, undeterred by forfeiture of the deposit it had paid, a site which it had won in a bidding exercise, and some companies shelved their listing plans. Moreover, it is learned that a tide of emigration from Hong Kong has recurred. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
whether it has assessed how the status of Hong Kong as an international city and a top-notch investment and financial centre has been undermined by the widespread anger among the people which has been triggered by the Government's proposed legislative amendments; of the measures put in place to restore the confidence of the international community and members of the public in Hong Kong's future;
(2)
whether it has assessed the negative impacts of the depressing social sentiment and the chaotic political situation on the local property and stock markets as well as the overall economy, and the mitigation measures; and
(3)
whether it has assessed the negative impacts of the resurge of the emigration tide on Hong Kong's economic development and labour supply, and of the mitigation measures?





Question 4
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Supply of live pigs

Hon Wilson OR to ask:
In May this year, the operation of Sheung Shui Slaughterhouse ("SSSH") was suspended for several days on two occasions as some pig samples collected there had been tested positive for African Swine Fever ("ASF") virus, with the import of Mainland live pigs being suspended during such periods of time. It is learnt that since the resumption of the operation of the slaughterhouse on 6 June, the average daily number of live pigs imported from the Mainland has been below 1 700, which is way lower than last year's daily average of around 4 000. It has been reported that as live pigs imported from the Mainland account for more than 90% of the total live pig supply, and with demand outstripping supply, the auction price of live pigs and the retail price of fresh pork are substantially higher than the levels in the past. Furthermore, owing to the drop in the number of pigs slaughtered, there is a pressure for live pig delivery and slaughtering fees to rise. Therefore, the retail price of fresh pork might rise further. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
whether it knows why the import of live pigs from the Mainland has not returned to the previous level since the resumption of the operation of SSSH; whether it has taken measures to make the import of live pigs restore to the previous level as soon as possible, e.g. discussing with the Mainland authorities the expansion of the list of registered pig farms on the Mainland for supply to Hong Kong and Macao, or considering the exploration of new sources of live pigs;
(2)
whether it has assessed the impacts of the persistently high fresh pork price on those industries related to live pigs, restaurants and members of the public; and
(3)
whether it has taken new measures to prevent the contraction of ASF by local and imported pigs, the contraction of diseases by pigs through cross-transmission in the slaughterhouses, and the outbreak of ASF in Hong Kong?





Question 5
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Legislation and measures for protecting children

Hon Elizabeth QUAT to ask:
In the past decade, the annual numbers of newly reported child abuse cases stood at around 1 000. Yet, among such cases, the annual numbers of neglect cases showed an upward trend. Regarding the law and measures for protecting children, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
given that a sub-committee of the Law Reform Commission conducted earlier on a three-month public consultation on the introduction of a new criminal offence of "failure to protect a child or vulnerable person where the child's or vulnerable person's death or serious harm results from an unlawful act or neglect", whether the Government has drawn up the relevant legislative timetable and, before such legislation is enacted, what interim measures are in place to step up the protection of children from high risk families;
(2)
given that young persons aged 15 or above may be lawfully employed, but some parents dare not leave their children aged below 16 unattended at home for fear of committing the offence of "ill-treatment or neglect by those in charge of child or young person" under section 27 of the Offences against the Person Ordinance, resulting in such children wandering in the streets all day long and running the risk of going astray, whether the Government will review the said provision and lower the age ceiling for the children who are subject to this provision, to dovetail with the actual situation; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
(3)
given that the number of cases of psychological abuse of children received by a concern group in the last financial year more than doubled the figure of the year before, but no relevant offence is provided under the existing legislation, whether the Government will enact legislation in this regard; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; of the details of the immediate and long-term treatments currently provided for the relevant child victims?





Question 6
(For oral reply)

(Translation)

Development of general hospitals

Hon Holden CHOW to ask:
At present, the North Lantau Hospital ("NLH") is not a general hospital, making it necessary for quite a number of Tung Chung residents to travel a long distance to seek consultation at the Princess Margaret Hospital. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council if it knows:
(1)
the criteria adopted by the Hospital Authority ("HA") for determining the need to develop a non-general hospital into a general one, and the existing general hospitals in the various districts across the territory;
(2)
whether HA has plans to develop NLH into a general hospital, so as to meet the incessantly increasing healthcare needs of Tung Chung brought about by its population growth; and
(3)
whether HA has plans to introduce new specialist outpatient services at NLH in the coming five years; if so, the details?





Question 7
(For written reply)

(Translation)

A homicide case in Taiwan involving Hong Kong residents

Hon Starry LEE to ask:
A Hong Kong man was suspected of murdering an accompanying Hong Kong woman in Taiwan in February last year and returned to Hong Kong afterwards. As the Government may not, under the existing legislation, transfer the man to Taiwan for trial, the Security Bureau submitted to this Council in February this year a legislative proposal seeking to amend the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance (Cap. 503) and the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Ordinance (Cap. 525). On the 23rd of this month, the Government formally withdrew the bill concerned. On the other hand, that man, who had been sentenced to imprisonment for convicted offences of money laundering, finished serving the sentence and was released this month. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council whether, at present, it has any plans (e.g. through the existing mechanism) to expeditiously transfer the man to Taiwan for trial, in order to seek justice for the deceased, thereby upholding justice; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?





Question 8
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Use of force against demonstrators

Hon Alvin YEUNG to ask:
It has been reported that on 9 June this year, over a million members of the public participated in a procession to protest against the Government's proposed legislative amendments concerning the surrender of fugitive offenders. After the end of the procession at night and up till the small hours of the following morning, some demonstrators who had stayed behind to continue to protest in the vicinity of the Legislative Council Complex had physical confrontations with police officers. Police officers used Oleoresin Capsicum ("OC") foam (commonly known as "pepper spray") against the demonstrators, hit them with batons, and arrested 19 young persons aged between 19 and 34. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the number of persons arrested, broken down by (i) the age group to which they belonged (as shown in Table 1) and their gender, and (ii) the offence that they were alleged to have committed and the location of arrest (to be set out in Table 1 and Table 2 respectively);

Table 1

Age group (years old) Gender Number of persons
19 to 20 Male  
Female  
21 to 22 Male  
Female  
23 to 25 Male  
Female  
26 to 30 Male  
Female  
31 to 34 Male  
Female  


Table 2

  Location of arrest
     
Alleged offence     
    
    
(2)
as it has been reported that in the small hours on 10 June this year, the names and identity card numbers of a number of demonstrators, who were besieged or pursued by police officers, were recorded, of the number of those demonstrators, with a breakdown by (i) the age group to which they belonged and (ii) their gender (to be set out in Table 3);

Table 3

Age group (years old) Gender Number of persons
Under 16 Male  
Female  
16 to 18 Male  
Female  
19 to 25 Male  
Female  
26 to 40 Male  
Female  
41 to 65 Male  
Female  
Above 65 Male  
Female  
(3)
of the respective quantities of (i) OC spray, (ii) OC jet pack solution and (iii) spray or solution of similar nature, used by the Police during the aforesaid incident;
(4)
of the objective criteria or guidelines adopted by the Police for determining if there is a need to use pepper spray;
(5)
as the Hong Kong Police Force Procedures Manual provides that when a person has been hit with batons, the Formation Commander or officer-in-charge of the Formation concerned is required to submit afterwards an initial report to the Major Formation Commander with a copy of the report forwarded to the Assistant Commissioner of Police (Support), of the number of initial reports concerning the aforesaid incident received by the Police so far; whether the Police will make public such reports;
(6)
of the following details of each case in the reports mentioned in (5): (i) the names of the officers using batons, (ii) their ranks, (iii) the injuries suffered by the persons being hit, (iv) the number of hits, and (v) the areas of hits (set out in Table 4); and

Table 4

(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)Other remarks
      
(7)
whether it will make public the latest versions of the Police General Orders and the Hong Kong Police Force Procedures Manual in their entirety, according to chapters and annexes, to facilitate public understanding of the law enforcement standards adopted by the Police; if so, please provide the latest versions of the Orders and the Manual (together with annexes); if not, of the reasons for that?





Question 9
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Access to patient information by the Police

Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki to ask:
After serious confrontations between police officers and demonstrators in the vicinity of Admiralty on 12 June this year, some demonstrators who had gone to the accident and emergency ("A&E") departments of public hospitals for treatment of injuries were arrested there by the Police. It was reported in the press on 18 June that any person could access, through the computers in the A&E departments without going through the procedure for logging in with a password, the patient information contained in the Accident and Emergency Information System ("AEIS"), and that the system had a page designated "For Police". The Hospital Authority ("HA") subsequently clarified that AEIS was for the exclusive use of healthcare workers and the page concerned was only a printing option in the "Disaster" module of AEIS. HA also indicated that from 20 June onwards, AEIS could be accessed only after going through the procedure for logging in with a password. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the number of aforesaid persons arrested in the A&E departments, with a tabulated breakdown by (i) name of hospital, (ii) the offences allegedly committed by them and (iii) the age group to which they belonged (i.e. under 16 years old, 16 to 18 years old, 19 to 25 years old, 26 to 40 years old, 41 to 65 years old, and above 65 years old);
(2)
regarding the situation about AEIS as mentioned in the aforesaid press report, whether the management staff of (i) the Food and Health Bureau, (ii) the Security Bureau, (iii) the Department of Health ("DH") and (iv) HA were aware of it beforehand; if so, since when they became aware of it;
(3)
since which date the Police had been able to obtain the patient information contained in AEIS, of the types of information obtained and the to-date number of patients involved; the to-date number of persons arrested by the Police based on such information, with a tabulated breakdown by the offences allegedly committed by them and the locations of arrest (the name of hospital if in hospital); and
(4)
whether currently the Police are able to access the patient information contained in the computer systems of the clinics under DH and of private hospitals; if so, how the Government ensures that the privacy of patients is properly safeguarded? 





Question 10
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Driving test centres under the Transport Department

Hon Martin LIAO to ask:
It has been reported that from time to time, certain driving test centres ("DTCs") under the Transport Department are closed during opening days due to a shortage of driving examiners. As a result, candidates have to wait for a long time before they can take road tests of driving tests ("road tests"). In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the average number of opening days per week on which the various DTCs were closed, in each of the past three years, as well as the major reasons for the closure;
(2)
of the staffing establishment, number of vacancies and wastage (broken down by the cause of wastage (e.g. retirement and resignation)) of driving examiners, in each of the past three years, as well as the estimated figures for each of the coming three years (set out in a table);
(3)
of the respective numbers of persons who took road tests for (i) non-commercial vehicles and (ii) commercial vehicles in each of the past three years, as well as the respective average, lowest and highest numbers of calendar days for which they had waited before taking the road tests (set out in a table);
(4)
as some members of the transport trade have relayed that there has been a serious shortage of commercial vehicle drivers in recent years, whether the Government has assessed if the long waiting time for candidates to take road tests for commercial vehicles has aggravated this problem; and
(5)
whether it will consider converting sites of DTCs with low utilization rates to other uses, so as to optimize the utilization of land resources?





Question 11
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Arrest of demonstrators on 12 June this year

Hon Tanya CHAN to ask:
On 12 June this year, quite a number of demonstrators gathered in the vicinity of the Legislative Council Complex, protesting against the Government's proposed legislative amendments concerning the surrender of fugitive offenders. Police officers used force to disperse the demonstrators and arrested quite a number of demonstrators on the spot and in the accident and emergency ("A&E") departments of public hospitals. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the total number of participants of the aforesaid demonstration arrested to date, with breakdowns (to be set out in Table 1 and Table 2 respectively) by (i) the offence that they were alleged to have committed and the location of arrest, and (ii) the age group to which they belonged (as set out in Table 2);

Table 1

  Location of arrest
     
Alleged offence     
    
    


Table 2

Age group (years old) Gender Number of persons
Below 16 Male  
Female  
16 to 18 Male  
Female  
19 to 25 Male  
Female  
26 to 40 Male  
Female  
41 to 65 Male  
Female  
Above 65 Male  
Female  
(2)
how the Police came to know that some demonstrators were receiving treatment in the A&E departments of public hospitals, upon which police officers were sent there to arrest them; and
(3)
of the factors to be considered by the Department of Justice in deciding which of the offence provisions (e.g. section 17B (disorder in public places), section 18 (unlawful assembly) and section 19 (riot)) under the Public Order Ordinance (Cap. 245) are to be invoked for instituting prosecutions against those arrestees?





Question 12
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Employment of persons with disabilities by the Government

Hon CHAN Han-pan to ask:
In recent years, while the overall employment rate in Hong Kong has remained at high levels, the employment rate of persons with disabilities ("PWDs") has been persistently low. According to the findings of a survey conducted by the Census and Statistics Department in 2013, the employment rate of PWDs aged 15 and above was 13.6%, and that of the 43 000 PWDs holding post-secondary qualifications among them was around 34.7%. On the other hand, the percentage of civil servants with disabilities in the total number of civil servants had declined for five consecutive years, dropping from 2.1% in 2013-2014 to 1.7% in 2017-2018. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the respective numbers of the existing and newly recruited government employees with disabilities (including civil servants and non-civil service contract staff) and their percentages in the total number of government employees in each of the past three years, together with a tabulated breakdown by (i) the employing department of such employees, (ii) their type of disability, (iii) the grade to which they belonged and (iv) the type of jobs in which they were engaged;
(2)
whether the Government, being the largest employer in Hong Kong, will consider afresh implementing within the Government an employment quota system for PWDs, so as to take the lead; if so, of the details and timetable; if not, the reasons for that; and
(3)
given that quite a number of types of jobs within the government structure (e.g. telephone customer services and certain clerical work) can aptly be taken up by PWDs, whether the Government will consider giving PWDs priority for employment when conducting recruitment exercises for posts of designated types of jobs; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?





Question 13
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Serving teachers changing their jobs to work for the Education Bureau

Hon Tommy CHEUNG to ask:
Some members of the education sector have complained to me that in recent years, the Education Bureau ("EDB") has, from time to time, conducted open recruitment exercises for positions the entry requirements of which include a certain number of years' teaching experience. As the appointees are usually serving teachers, the schools at which such teachers originally teach often have to recruit teachers midway through a school term in order to fill the vacancies, thus affecting the operation of the schools and the learning progress of the students. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the number of serving teachers who changed their jobs to work for EDB in each of the past 10 years and, among them, the number of those who changed their jobs midway through a school term; and
(2)
whether EDB will, in future, arrange as far as possible the serving teachers appointed by it to report for duty during the summer break, so as to avoid affecting the operation of the schools at which they originally teach as well as the learning progress of the students; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?





Question 14
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Elderly Dental Assistance Programme

Hon YUNG Hoi-yan to ask:
The Elderly Dental Assistance Programme ("the Programme"), launched by the Community Care Fund in September 2012, provides free removable dentures and related dental services to low-income elderly persons who are users of home care service or home help service subvented by the Social Welfare Department. The eligibility for participating in the Programme was relaxed in September 2015, October 2016, July 2017 and February 2019 to cover elderly persons who were/are Old Age Living Allowance recipients aged 80 or above, aged 75 or above, aged 70 or above and aged 65 or above respectively. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the respective numbers of elderly persons eligible for participating in the Programme when it was first launched and upon each relaxation of the eligibility; the number of elderly persons participating in the Programme in the three months after each relaxation, and the percentage of such number in the total number of eligible elderly persons, as well as how such figures compare with the relevant figures for three months prior to that relaxation;
(2)
of the respective numbers of participating dental clinics and dentists in each year since the launch of the Programme, with a breakdown by District Council district;
(3)
of the largest, smallest and average numbers of elderly persons to whom the participating dentists provided dental services under the Programme, and the number of dentists who did not provide such services throughout the year (and the reasons for that), in each of the past three years; and
(4)
whether it has reviewed if the implementation of the Programme (including the numbers of participating elderly persons and dentists) has achieved the expected results; if it has reviewed and the outcome is that the expected results have not been achieved, of the measures put in place to (i) boost the participation rate of elderly persons, and (ii) avoid the situation that participating dentists do not provide the relevant services at all throughout a year?





Question 15
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Talent training for the insurance sector and
the asset and wealth management sector

Hon CHAN Kin-por to ask:
In view of the persistent shortage of talents faced by the insurance sector as well as the asset and wealth management sector, the Government launched a three-year Pilot Programme to Enhance Talent Training for the Insurance Sector and the Asset and Wealth Management Sector ("Pilot Programme") in August 2016 to help promote these two sectors and enhance the professional competence of their practitioners. The initiatives under the Pilot Programme include public education, financial incentive schemes for professional training, summer internship programmes and a work-and-learn programme. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the respective numbers of participants in the professional training, summer internship and work-and-learn programmes since the launch of the Pilot Programme, as well as the latest progress of the various initiatives;
(2)
whether it has assessed the effectiveness of the training and promotional efforts under the Pilot Programme; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
(3)
whether it will regularize the Pilot Programme to train talents for and attract new blood to the two sectors on an on-going basis, so as to seize the opportunities brought by the development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and the "Belt and Road" Initiative; and
(4)
whether it will consider establishing an academy of insurance so as to assist the insurance sector in training talents more effectively; if so, of the details and the timetable; if not, the reasons for that?





Question 16
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Foreigners being held at the airport for questioning and denied entry

Hon HUI Chi-fung to ask:
It has been reported that a former Secretary of Foreign Affairs of the Philippines, who arrived in Hong Kong with a diplomatic passport in June this year, was denied entry into Hong Kong after having been held by the Immigration Department ("ImmD") for questioning for over five hours. In May this year, a former Ombudsman of the Philippines, who arrived in Hong Kong with an ordinary passport, was also held for questioning, notwithstanding that she was eventually granted entry. On the other hand, in March this year, these two persons, together with some Filipino fishermen, filed a lawsuit with the International Criminal Court against various Chinese officials, including the State President, for alleged crimes against humanity. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the general reasons for ImmD to reject the entry of foreigners;
(2)
of the reasons for subjecting these two persons to the aforesaid treatment upon their arrival in Hong Kong, and whether such reasons include their posing security threats to Hong Kong;
(3)
of the Central Authorities' roles in the immigration matters of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ("SAR"); whether the SAR Government had received any instruction beforehand from the Central Authorities regarding the entry of these two persons into Hong Kong; if so, of the details;
(4)
whether the SAR Government's handling of the entry of these two persons had been affected by the stance of the Central Authorities; if so, whether it has assessed if the Central Authorities had contravened (i) the principles and policies of implementing "Hong Kong people administering Hong Kong" and a high degree of autonomy in SAR, or (ii) Article 22 of the Basic Law; if it has assessed and the outcome is in the affirmative, of the follow-up actions; if the assessment outcome is in the negative, the justifications for that;
(5)
whether, under those provisions of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations having the force of law in Hong Kong, ImmD is empowered to hold a foreigner with a diplomatic passport for questioning or to deny his/her entry; whether it has assessed if ImmD's treatment of the aforesaid diplomatic passport holder contravened the relevant provision(s); and
(6)
whether it has assessed if the aforesaid incident, which has aroused much international concern, has adverse impacts on Hong Kong's international reputation and investment environment; if it has assessed and the outcome is in the affirmative, of the measures in place to prevent the occurrence of similar incidents; if the assessment outcome is in the negative, the reasons for that?





Question 17
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Unauthorized display of items in country parks

Hon Steven HO to ask:
From time to time in recent years, there have been people displaying large vertical banners on prominent cliff faces or posting slogans and painting graffiti on both sides of hiking trails within country parks for expressing political aspirations or publicizing political messages. The Government has to spend public money and deploy manpower to remove such items and carry out clearance work. In recent months, there were again a spate of cases of displaying large vertical banners. Some members of the public are annoyed at this, and have expressed concern that the Government has all along been unable to curb such acts over the years. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the respective numbers of reports received in each of the past five years on unauthorized (i) display of vertical banners and (ii) posting of slogans and painting of graffiti in country parks; the procedure, manpower and expenditure involved in the operations to remove or clear such items;
(2)
of (i) the number of patrols conducted in country parks and special areas for combating unauthorized display of vertical banners, and (ii) the number of operations conducted during patrols to remove or clear such items, by government officers in each month of the past five years; the respective manpower, expenditure and time involved in such operations;
(3)
of the respective current staffing establishment of those civil servants responsible for patrolling country parks and special areas;
(4)
as the Country Parks and Special Areas Regulations (Cap. 208A) provides that no person without permission shall, within a country park or special area, display any sign, notice, poster, banner or advertisement, of the respective numbers of persons prosecuted and convicted in each of the past five years for unauthorized display of large vertical banners within country parks, and the punishments imposed on those convicted; if there were no cases of prosecution and conviction, whether it has studied if this situation was due to insufficient efforts in combating such acts; and
(5)
whether it will raise the relevant penalties and step up law enforcement efforts so as to curb this undesirable trend; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that? 





Question 18
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Vacant school premises under the Education Bureau

Hon IP Kin-yuen to ask:
It has been reported that the Education Bureau ("EDB") has planned to lend the premises of a primary school, which will soon be vacated, to a service organization for the visually impaired, for use as a decanting site for the sheltered workshop under it. Regarding the vacant school premises under EDB, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
when the application for borrowing the school premises concerned from the aforesaid organization was received, the time taken for vetting and approval of the application, and the reasons for approving the application, by EDB, and the duration of the tenancy;
(2)
given that the facilities in the school premises concerned are not even up to current standards, whether the Government had assessed if the school premises were suitable for operating a sheltered workshop or factory; if it had assessed and the outcome was in the affirmative, of the method and criteria adopted for the assessment, as well as the details of the assessment outcome (including whether the premises could accommodate the workshop's existing large-scale machinery, whether the various floors could withstand the weight of such machinery, the maximum number of trainees that the premises could accommodate, and whether the workshop in operation would generate noise exceeding the standards);
(3)
whether, before approving the said service organization's application, EDB had received other applications for borrowing the school premises concerned; if so, of the details of such applications, including (i) the number of such applications, (ii) the dates of receipt, (iii) the nature of business in which the applicants were engaged, (iv) the proposed uses of the school premises, and (v) the reasons for such applications being rejected;
(4)
of the long-term planned uses of the school premises concerned and of its site;
(5)
of the following details in respect of each application approved in each of the past five school years for borrowing school premises under EDB (set out in a table):
(i)
the name of the school which had used the premises concerned before the premises were left vacant,
(ii)
the address of the premises,
(iii)
the floor area of the premises,
(iv)
the number of years for which the premises had been left vacant,
(v)
the name and type of the borrower unit (e.g. policy bureau/government department, school sponsoring body, non-profit making organization),
(vi)
the proposed use(s),
(vii)
the number of years of borrowing the premises, and
(viii)
the charges/rents for borrowing the premises;
(6)
of the current channel(s) through which the public can access the information about those vacant school premises under EDB that are available for borrowing; and
(7)
whether non-governmental organizations ("NGOs") (including schools) may apply for borrowing vacant or soon-to-be-vacated school premises under EDB at present; if so, of the details, including (i) the channel(s) for making applications, (ii) the vetting and approval procedure, (iii) the approving authority, (iv) the criteria for vetting and approval of applications, as well as (v) whether policy bureaux/government departments are given priority for borrowing the premises; if NGOs may not, the reasons for that?





Question 19
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Provision of welfare facilities and services

Hon Vincent CHENG to ask:
The Financial Secretary announced in this year's Budget the allocation of $20 billion for the Government to purchase properties over some three years for the operation of welfare facilities and services, such as child care centres ("CCCs"), day care centres for the elderly, neighbourhood elderly centres, and on-site pre-school rehabilitation services. On the other hand, the Government has, in accordance with the recommendations in the Final Report of the Consultancy Study on the Long-term Development of Child Care Services, formulated a planning ratio for aided CCC places (i.e. 103 places for children aged below three per 20 000 persons). In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(1)
of the respective current numbers of CCCs, day care centres for the elderly, neighbourhood elderly centres, district elderly community centres, and on-site pre-school rehabilitation service units in the territory, as well as the respective numbers and utilization rates of service places provided by them, with a breakdown by District Council ("DC") district;
(2)
given that the Government plans to purchase properties for providing at least one additional CCC in each DC district, whether this number is set according to the aforesaid planning ratio; and
(3)
regarding the three DC districts of Sham Shui Po, Yau Tsim Mong and Kowloon City respectively,
(a)
of the current (i) number of service places, (ii) manpower and (iii) utilization rates in respect of each subsidized child care service in the district, and set out in a table the relevant details by name of organization providing the service;
(b)
whether it has assessed if the provision of one additional CCC in the district can meet the demand of local residents for the relevant services; of the indicators (such as utilization rates) adopted for determining whether child care services in the district are adequate; and
(c)
whether it will consider further increasing the number of service places and manpower for subsidized child care services in the district, so as to alleviate the pressure on dual-income parents in taking care of their children; if so, of the details?  





Question 20
(For written reply)

(Translation)

Training courses offered as commissioned
by the Employees Retraining Board

Hon LEUNG Yiu-chung to ask:
Will the Government inform this Council of (i) the number of training courses offered by each Training Body as commissioned by the Employees Retraining Board ("ERB"), and (ii) the amount of funding provided by ERB to each Training Body for offering such courses, in each of the financial years from 2017-2018 to 2019-2020?